<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vision Master Designs &#187; Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visionmasterdesigns.com/tag/search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visionmasterdesigns.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 12:09:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review : Can Cuil do a Google ?</title>
		<link>http://visionmasterdesigns.com/review-can-cuil-do-a-google/</link>
		<comments>http://visionmasterdesigns.com/review-can-cuil-do-a-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok! I have heard a lot now ! Well, Cuil is the newest search engine on the block, From the above image, the first thing that comes to your head is &#8220;OMG ! 121,617,892,992 pages&#8221; !! Cuil also has nice looking interface (unlike google &#8211; nice logos though), But looks are not the only factor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 0.6em 0.6em;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvisionmasterdesigns.com%2Freview-can-cuil-do-a-google%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fvisionmasterdesigns.com%2Freview-can-cuil-do-a-google%2F&amp;source=rowoot&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Cuil Front Page" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuil.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-267 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuil.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Cuil Front Page" width="425" height="237" /></a></p>
<p><!-- google_ad_section_start --><br />
Ok! I have heard a lot now ! Well, Cuil is the newest search engine on the block, From the above image, the first thing that comes to your head is &#8220;OMG ! 121,617,892,992 pages&#8221; !!<br />
Cuil also has nice looking interface (unlike google &#8211; nice logos though), But looks are not the only factor to decide which search engine is the best.<br />
If you look at the guys behind Cuil, you`ll notice some of them are from <strong>Google</strong>, the founder and others from IBM etc. They have a management full of big guns !</p>
<p>So lets see how Cuil fares against Google in narrowing down results from today&#8217;s one of the most prominent markets&#8230;The Internet.</p>
<ul>
<li>Test 1 : Interface</li>
<li>Test 2 : Average default Loading Times for any search</li>
<li>Test 3 : Search Results</li>
<li>Conclusion</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-262"></span></p>
<h2>Test 1 : Interface</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Interface" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/untitled-6.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-270 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/untitled-6.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Interface" width="425" height="162" /></a><br />
<small>Cuil Interface v/s Google Interface</small></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Searched Results" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/search.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-273 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/search.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Searched Results" width="425" height="124" /></a><br />
<small>Cuil Interface v/s Google Interface &#8211; Results</small></p>
<h4>Cuil</h4>
<p>The home page is neat, clean and pretty ! Quite appealing to the eye ! The Search box is well placed. There is an autosuggest feature as well. When you search for a result, the page is displayed in 3 different coloumns (you can change the way it is displayed i.e 2 or 3 coloumns), which I found quite wierd (since I am used to google results perhaps ?!). The keyword I used was &#8216;hosting&#8217; and I got a neat AJAX powered category box to help me refine my search, nice !<br />
Thumbnails for every site in the result is displayed.<br />
To goto the next page, there was a neat tab. It was a good feature to add</p>
<p>Overall, people may find it appealing. The look is a boon for newbies surely !</p>
<h4>Google</h4>
<p>Ok ! Now I bet everyone must have googled once in a while, anyways, the same old classic google home page. Sometimes the results page tends to get cluttered with ads all around when you are searching for a particular keyword, but in general the look is plain.<br />
To goto the next page, I had to scroll down all the way, till I found Gooooooooogle <img src='http://visionmasterdesigns.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>EDIT :<br />
If you want to try google with the cool autosuggest feature, you can visit here <a href="http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1&#038;hl=en" taget="_blank">http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1&#038;hl=en</a><br />
Thanks Andycolden.</p>
<h2>Test 2 : Loading Times</h2>
<p>For testing the loading times, I used pingdom.com. The unique thing about the tool in this site is that it loads everything i.e HTML,CSS,RSS any Scripts if present etc. I had searched for &#8220;php mysql tutorial&#8221; in both Cuil.com and google.com. The graphs are respectively posted below.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="cuilspeed" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuilspeed.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-297 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuilspeed.thumbnail.jpg" alt="cuilspeed" width="425" height="226" /></a><br />
<small>Cuil took approx 4sec.</small></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="googlespeed" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/googlespeed.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-298 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/googlespeed.thumbnail.jpg" alt="googlespeed" width="425" height="130" /></a><br />
<small>Google took approx 0.7sec.</small></p>
<p>Since Cuil tends to load a particular website&#8217;s logo image or so, the time taken for cuil to load a page is more compared to Google. But then hey ! you can`t have everything together right ?!<br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --><br />
<!--adman--><br />
<!-- google_ad_section_start --></p>
<h2>Test 3 : Search Results</h2>
<p>Now this is the most important of all the tests ! Everyone wants the best results ! So lets put our search engines to the test ! I obviously couldn`t run a full comprehensive search. But there are some things I have noticed.</p>
<ol>
<li>For one, Cuil rarely returned any wikipedia results (atleast for me). Some keywords I used to search were nouns (names of prominent people), names of different places. I guess Cuil hasn`t given much preference to wikipedia pages or so.</li>
<li>Keyword: &#8216;country India&#8217; &#8211; Returned results completely irrelevant, while Keyword: &#8216;India country&#8217; displayed good results. (Cuil returned 65,000 results while google returned 36,000,000 results)<br />
Google also displayed much relevant pages compared to Cuil with the above keywords.</li>
<li>According to Cuil&#8217;s technology, it ranks pages on the basis of its content and not on the basis of clicks. Currently it claims to have indexed 120billion pages.</li>
<li>I wanted to know more details about the latest iphone 3g. So I used, Keyword: &#8216;iphone 3g july 2008&#8242;. returned 257 results in cuil which were not that satisfying since none of the results were fresh, while google was able to retrieve the latest information with ease.</li>
</ol>
<p>Cuil has recieved tremendous response despite being released with barely any publicity. Check the following graph by alexa.com</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="cuilrank" rel="lightbox[pics262]" href="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuilrank.jpg"><img class="attachment wp-att-303 centered" src="http://www.visionmasterdesigns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/cuilrank.jpg" alt="cuilrank" width="425" height="293" /></a><br />
<small>Amazing response ! After 3 days the rank was 1,090,420</small></p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>In general, Cuil.com is a good search engine. The results were a bit monotonous. The Search Index is very impressive, the collection is large, but it needs to be constantly updated with new pages. I couldn&#8217;t get fresh results using cuil.com and sometimes the results were completely irrelevant.</p>
<p>As of now I am still sticking to google.com, but I`ll surely give cuil try for its neat interface and nice autosuggest feature and tabs based on your search query.<br />
<!-- google_ad_section_end --><br />
<strong>Overall : Cuil &#8211; Good Index, Results still need more polishing</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://visionmasterdesigns.com/review-can-cuil-do-a-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
